<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Knowledge Scotland &#187; tax enquiry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legalknowledgescotland.com/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=tax-enquiry" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legalknowledgescotland.com</link>
	<description>Legal support for lawyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:58:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Two important tax decisions</title>
		<link>http://www.legalknowledgescotland.com/?p=665</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalknowledgescotland.com/?p=665#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 09:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Aitken]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDLT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax enquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax reliefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax tribunal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalknowledgescotland.com/?p=665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cameron &#38; Ors v Revenue &#38; Customs [2012] EWHC 1174 (Admin) A taxpayer is entitled to rely upon a statement made in a formal HMRC publication unless and until the statement was revoked, withdrawn or altered with reasonable notice to all relevant taxpayers.  This applies even if a tax inspector had expressed a contrary view.  This matter [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Cameron &amp; Ors v Revenue &amp; Customs [2012] EWHC 1174 (Admin)</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A taxpayer is entitled to rely upon a statement made in a formal HMRC publication unless and until the statement was revoked, withdrawn or altered with reasonable notice to all relevant taxpayers.  This applies even if a tax inspector had expressed a contrary view.  This matter concerned the application of concessionary treatment for seafarer&#8217;s earning deduction relief.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This decision appears to contradict the Supreme Court&#8217;s finding in the Gaines-Cooper residence case.   The full report from the England &amp; Wales High Court administrative division  can be found <a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2012/1174.html">here</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Orsman v Revenue &amp; Customs [2012] UKFTT 227 (TC)</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">HMRC cannot introduce an additional argument in its statement of case to a tribunal that it had not included in its closure notice.   A &#8220;closure notice&#8221; is usually a letter issued by HMRC to the customer that its enquiry has ended.  The purpose of the &#8220;statement of case&#8221; is also to tell the customer what HMRC&#8217;s case is and is submitted to the tax tribunal.  </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This matter concerned a Stamp Duty Land Tax return. </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The full decision of the First-tier Tax Tribunal can be found <a href="http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/TC/2012/TC01921.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalknowledgescotland.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=665</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
